RACER X wrote:This is a great point and we try to do the same thing also, comply with the same rules for the district race. This will be our pack's 3rd. year running our race, and I agree with Stan and Darrin, we are trying to make the rules consistant each year so everyone enjoys the event. We will let some cars go that are a bit of a "Push" on the rules or go as far to help a boy modify his car to comply. I like to see some creativity and inovation, even if Dad had a hand in it, hopefuly the child learns something from it. Show them how to "think out of the box".
Try as we might, it is difficult toget exactly the same interpretations of identical unit and district/council rules. I hope that when the pack race inspector gives a pass on a questionable car, he also warns the owner that the district race inspector might disagree.
We don't have a "district rules hot-line" to help the inspector out when he encounters something that is new to him. Should we? We do have CS Roundtable EarlyBird to discuss district PW rules and changes each year. And, we have "excruciatingly detailed rules" and supporting material available online to the builders.
I have heard several boys/parents tell the district inspector that a particular "feature" must be okay because their cubmaster/inspector approved it at the pack races.
Fortunately, most inspection exceptions can be resolved in the pits during the inspection period. There are exceptions, though. One of the hardest for me was a car whose wheels extended about 1/8" beyond the body of the car. To me, personally, this is a non-issue, because it does not help the car (hurts it, in fact). But the overwhelming preference of the rules committee was "everything behind the starting pin," and this was established in the rules accordingly. I am looking forward to having an alternative to an onsite drill press in the pits to resolve this type of problem this year! (Thanks, "Pro-")