A question about attack angle vs loss in kinetic energy
Posted: Sat Dec 20, 2014 7:58 am
as always, forgive me if this thread has already been authored and explored, but as i was contemplating a wooden track build, my thoughts turned to the curved transition section. Here is my qeury - is there a measurable loss of energy in the curved section of bestrack style tracks as the cars are transitioned to the flat sections, to the point that it has a significant variance from a constant radius start section?
I don't know if im saying that correctly, but I have noticed over the years cars have a "settling" movement as they hit the bottom of the curve, indicating the downforce of gravity is having an effect on the car as it relates to the track below. One would think the inertia in that downward direction, being interrupted by the curve section, would absorb more of that potential energy than a constant radius start section, where the interrruption of that energy is more linear rather than abrupt?
That is my pondering question this morning, however hamfisted the wording may be, and as always I thank you in advance for your learned input and experience...
Your friend, in timer..
Nicholas
I don't know if im saying that correctly, but I have noticed over the years cars have a "settling" movement as they hit the bottom of the curve, indicating the downforce of gravity is having an effect on the car as it relates to the track below. One would think the inertia in that downward direction, being interrupted by the curve section, would absorb more of that potential energy than a constant radius start section, where the interrruption of that energy is more linear rather than abrupt?
That is my pondering question this morning, however hamfisted the wording may be, and as always I thank you in advance for your learned input and experience...
Your friend, in timer..
Nicholas